Moderation & Reporting

Infocam hosts text-only reader discussions. Every comment and review is checked by an automated moderation system before publication. The system rejects spam, advertising, gibberish, harassment, hate speech, profanity and clearly off-topic submissions; genuine opinions about camera gear are published, including critical ones.

When a submission is not published, you immediately see a specific reason for the decision on screen, and the decision is recorded. Rejections are never silent.

Any moderation decision can be reviewed by a human. Submit an appeal through the form below (choose “Report illegal content” and describe your appeal) — it is free of charge, a person examines the decision, and we inform you of the outcome and its grounds without undue delay.

Anyone can report content they consider illegal — whether or not they are a reader of Infocam. A valid notice states what content is reported, where it appears (a link) and why it is alleged to be illegal. We act on valid notices without undue delay: content is removed or disabled, the reporter is informed, and records are kept as evidence under the DSA. Reports are processed in the order received, typically within a few working days.

As required by the Digital Services Act for hosting services, we maintain and publish aggregate information about moderation activity, keep statements of reasons for removals, and maintain a designated point of contact for authorities and out-of-court dispute bodies — reachable through the same form below.

Infocam is an informational editorial site, not a marketplace and not a trader's platform: no goods or services are sold here, so trader-to-consumer obligations (pre-contractual information, right of withdrawal, warranties) do not arise from site use. Consumer protection still governs any interaction we may have with you as a user, as described in the Terms of Use.